![]() |
|
|||
|
ACTIVITIES Archaeology Projects (external) |
Flotation Tank David Parker (Newsletter No 9 2005) Following the NDAS digs at Holworthy in 2003/04, we ended up with several bags of bulk sample material from post holes and gullies etc. The purpose was to extract any organic materials from the fill of these various holes. The Society had only a couple of sieves, which were not suitable to carry out the complete sorting of the samples. What we needed was some way of floating organic matter out. Having read descriptions of something called a ‘flotation tank’ I bravely (or foolishly) volunteered to have a go at constructing one. A couple of basic diagrams were found in leaflets and library books, but alas, no dimensions or details. The item most often used was a 40 gallon steel drum. This at least pointed me in the right direction, but these drums are not found lying about, nor do they grow on trees. At this time, the North Devon District Council began delivering ‘Wheely Bins’ to our area. That’s it, I thought, forget the steel drum, a wheely bin would be ideal, light in weight, and with wheels and a handle for pushing around. A phone call to the N.D.D.C. was very decisive, they cost over £200 and are definitely not for giving away, even to a highly respected NDAS. So it was back to a steel drum. Following a bit of prospecting in the boatyard at Watermouth harbour, I was put in touch with Andy Clark at ‘Alpharma’, a Chemical Company in Barnstaple. A steel drum was kindly donated to the Society, along with a plastic drum and a polythene tank, the latter very useful for a number of purposes, especially if you have a three stone baby to bath! After a bit of cutting, drilling, bending and hammering
and a lot of time spent thinking, something resembling the sketches I
had seen was produced, and with a splash of paint here and there it was
completed (See diagram). The big day arrived when six members of NDAS
turned up at our house to have a go. After processing two sample bags
we already had good results, but the method we used was somewhat inefficient,
basically because of lack of experience. After some trial and error however,
we arrived at what appears to be the most effective method of operation:
the drum is filled almost to the top
By these methods a good quantity of organic matter was obtained from the samples including many small fragments of charcoal plus a few carbonised grains of cereal, possibly barley or wheat (expert analysis will tell) as well as other seeds and plant fragments. Among these was what appears to be a ‘glume base’, this is the little thingummy that holds the cereal grains on to the ear of whatever plant it is. One lesson learned at the first session:
|
|||
| Copyright © 2010 North Devon Archaeological Society | ||||